Style2

The Goonies (1985) Directed by Richard Donner



While I remember first seeing this movie as a still very young kid, this is not one of those movies that I grew up with. As a matter of fact, I think I had only seen it just once, prior to my recent viewing of it, a couple of days ago. It therefor also isn't one of those movies I have fond and warm memories of, though I imaging this would have been a movie that I would have loved to watch, when I was still a young kid.

Problem with most of the recent kids movies nowadays is that they are too fluffy and play things far too safe. They really aren't willing to take any risks, at any department. The stories are generic, the characters all bland stereotypes and the humor too predictable. They besides love to feature all sort of moralistic messages in them, often combined with some forced drama and emotions. In other words, they really don't know how to connect to its younger audience anymore! The film-makers don't seem to remember how it was like to be a young kid and the things that excited you and made you happy and were interested in at the time. This movie luckily didn't forget about any of these things though. It seems to understand kids and its truly written and directed with the right type of audience constantly in mind. It's an adventurous and also imaginative movie, that in no way resembles a realistic movie but what kid ever wanted to have a realistic adventure?

That's the biggest reason why this movie is loved that much; it's an adventure movie with the type of adventure in it that young kids would love to have gone on, alongside with the goonies. The kids are the heroes in this, as well as the smart ones, while most of the adults are of course the clumsy and not too smart villains. Good thing about the movie is that it also isn't afraid to be a somewhat darker and more serious one at times. This at the same time also makes it all the more obvious how serious this movie was taking its target audience. The movie is not afraid to show you death and exaggerated violence. And there is nothing wrong with a kids movie being a genuinely scary and threatening one at times. It's all part of growing up really, so why shouldn't kids movies be allowed to show you any of these elements? It in a way gives the movie realism and ensures that its audience feels more invested in both its story and all of its many main characters.

Another thing that makes this movie a somewhat realistic feeling one is the way how all of the kids are acting in this. They truly act and behave like real kids. They respond to certain situations just like other normal kid would do in real life and perhaps more importantly; they talk like real kids. So yes, that means that there also is some cursing in this movie and boys being boys to each other and to girls. It's an extremely quotable movie actually.

It's a movie that's made and got approached just like any other major studio production. And that's no big surprise really, seeing all of the big names that were involved with making this movie. Director Richard Donner, producer Steven Spielberg, writer Chris Columbus, these all are some big names from the industry, who really understand film-making and never do half work. This all is really something this movie benefits from as well.

Now, I won't pretend as if this is the greatest adventure movie or best kids movie ever made though. It's still lacking in some ways, mainly in its story department. It's a tad bit too simplistic and straightforward at times for my taste and I was also definitely liking the movie better when it constantly was set at different locations, rather than just below ground, inside a hidden and dark cavern. I don't know, it just took away some of the fun for me and made the movie a bit too repetitive at times.

Luckily there is plenty of good humor and fun characters to enjoy in this. It's a genuinely funny and charming movie, which is also thanks to its great cast. Robert Davi, Joe Pantoliano and Anne Ramsey are great villains in this and the young cast involves some now big and famous names, such as Sean Astin and Josh Brolin, most notably.

This movie is some good '80's fun with also a good soundtrack to support it. I really liked it, though if you grew up with this movie you probably want to- and also should add an extra point to my rating.

7/10

Watch trailer

Code of Silence (1985) Directed by Andrew Davis



This movie is generally being regarded as one of the better Chuck Norrir flicks. I don't really have any other material to compare it to but I can still see why some people would feel that way about this movie. It's a genuinely good '80's genre flick, with an healthy amount of cheese sprinkled over it.

This is actually being a movie in which Norris gets to do some real acting. He isn't just constantly kicking and blasting people away but he is playing a real compelling and likable character as well.

The story is a bit all over the place though, I admit to that. At times I had no idea what was going on already but on the other hand, I also couldn't really care about it anyway. It's just a movie you have to take for what it is and don't think too much about its story or overall credibility.

It's just being one of those movies I won't mind watching when it catch it somewhere on TV, late at night, when I have nothing better to do. It's definitely being an entertaining enough genre flick, though I'm the first to admit that this is truly far from a great movie.

It's an obviously cheaply done film, without any true mind blowing action or explosions in it but still I don't feel that the lovers of action flicks would mind this all very much. There are still plenty of moments to compensate, such as a couple of formulaic chase sequences and shootouts. And I must say; Norris handles all of the action quite well and he certainly has the right charisma, which is required for these type of roles and this sort of movies.

A good movie to enjoy, if you won't be thinking too much about its story or what is all going on in it.

6/10

Watch trailer

Dèmoni (1985) Directed by Lamberto Bava



This movie basically has everything you would expect from an Italian genre movie. Gore, blood, demons, a great soundtrack...except no nudity! But oh well, you can't have everything I guess.

It's one of those pretty obscure Italian productions, with a mostly Italian cast and crew but it got shot in Germany and dubbed in English.

Thing that this movie has especially going for it is its originality. It using some pretty original settings and concept and has an original take on demons. The demons in this movie are being more like zombies, expect with plenty of the speed and superhuman strength to them as well.

It's a movie that is especially great to watch for the genre loves. The movie has some absolutely great looking gore in it and lots of time and effort got spend on it, as well as its wonderful gruesome looking makeup effects. And really, it's a very gory movie and also features plenty of creative stuff, you probably have never seen before.

I really liked its simple premise and settings. The movie is almost entirely set inside a cinema. The movie for its first half definitely reminded me a lot of the later gory and fun film "Angustia". It also has a downside though; it starts to make the movie a bit of a repetitive one after a while. The movie begins absolutely great and promising but its middle part doesn't really always deliver, while its ending still makes it all worthwhile again though.

As far as the genre goes, this is really one of the better and more creative Italian genre movies out there!

7/10

Watch trailer

Geung si sin sang (1985) Directed by Ricky Lau





(Review originally written at 7 September 2009)

Hong Kong movies from these days were always all somewhat clumsy and cheap looking, even the very best ones. It prevents me from ever calling an Hong Kong movie a true classic but they surely knew how to bring some entertaining movies to the silver screen.

This is a quite ridicules movie really, that combines horror, with comedy and kung fu action. The blend of it all works out rather successfully, making "Geung si sin sang" simply a fun movie to watch. Simplistic but fun.

In a way you can describe this movie as being rather lame, with its over-the-top performances, comical moments and action sequences. But with this the movie knows to create a great style that helps to make this movie such an entertaining one to watch.

What stood out to me was the movie its action. It has some greatly choreographed moments in it, that are spectacular looking but above all also adds to the movie its comedy. It's kind of like a Jackie Chan movie in that regard.

It's also a rather well looking movie, with some nice make up, costumes and settings. It isn't really a cheap looking movie, which means that the film-makers did a good job with their budget, which no doubt, wasn't very large.

It's a fun and at times spectacular movie to watch but also not really more than that really. It's simply good for what it is though.

7/10

Watch trailer

Ran (1985) Directed by Akira Kurosawa





(Review originally written at 13 July 2009)

Over the decades Akira Kurosawa has always maintained his own directing style and approach of a story and characters. For this he got acclaimed mostly throughout his early career, when he made movies like "Kakushi-toride no san-akunin", "Shichinin no samurai", "Rashômon" and "Yojimbo". Many people however seem to forget that Kurosawa never stopped making great movies. Reason why his later movies aren't acclaimed as much is because they were all less revolutionary and refreshing, while his earlier works was still very much unlike anything else and influenced lots of western film-makers.

The story is told in a typical slow Kurosawa way and also itself features lots of typical Kurosawa approaches and angles in it. The story itself is based on Shakespeare's King Lear, set in the early days of a small Japanese lordship. It has themes such as power and greed in it, which also provides the movie with plenty of intriguing characters, who all have their own agendas throughout the movie. It's characters, themes and definitely the directing of it all is the reason why "Ran" works out as a great Japanese epic.

The movie often doesn't use to many words to tell its story but the words that it does pick are effectively and carefully chosen. The movie tells the story slowly and things take a while to unravel. But ultimately in the end it turns out to be all very rewarding, like so often is the case with movies being told in such a specific manner.

It's a grand movie, with big looking settings, set in the natural environment and on the in- and outside of some large constructed castles. The movie also has lots of extra's in it, of course mostly during its big battle sequences.

It's a very stylish movies, of course mainly thanks to Kurosawa's directing. Kurosawa was almost completely blind at the time of making this movie but it didn't prevented him from delivering a visual masterpiece. Each shot and every frame are carefully thought about it seems and everything is planned out and executed into the smallest detail. The movie used three different cinematographers for some reason, who all provided the movie with some beautiful as well as powerful shots.

A great late Kurosawa epic!

9/10

Watch trailer

The Return of the Living Dead (1985) Directed by Dan O'Bannon





(Review originally written at 5 April 2009)

This is a rather weak and lame that tries to combine comedy with gory zombie-horror. Problem is that the balance between these two different genres isn't very good, meaning that the movie doesn't work out the way it was supposed to.

The idea was pretty good, the execution of it however really wasn't. The movie can be seen as on 'unofficial' sequel to the George A. Romero movie "Night of the Living Dead" and its sequels. Those movies of course already had a healthy dose of comedy in them and this movie tried to take its comedy one step further. The comedy is however to lame to consider it funny really, which is also due to its fairly poor production values and poor actors involved.

The movie is rather cheap looking and there really isn't enough gore or good make-up involved to please any zombie movie/gore fan. It has a bit of a B-movie feel and look over it, which of course gets also strengthened by its silly script and comedy.

The character are often more annoying then likable enough which, again, is due mostly to its weak writing and lame comedy. Seriously, this movie features the type of jokes and dialog that seems to be written by an 10-year old, in just one afternoon.

I like horror and I like cult-horror perhaps even better. This movie however really doesn't deserve to become a cult-horror classic. It's far too lame and weakly made for that.

If you want to see a good and above all effective cross of comedy and zombies just stick to "Shaun of the Dead".

5/10

Watch trailer

The Hills Have Eyes Part II (1985) Directed by Wes Craven





(Review originally written at 22 March 2009)

Wes Craven's 1977 movie "The Hills Have Eyes" was a surprisingly great genre movie. When Craven needed cash he decided to make "The Hills Have Eyes Part II" in 1985. It's a rush job that is sloppy and lazy written and often feels and looks like a B-movie, with some bad pacing, ineffective build-up and lame characters and acting performance, also due to its writing.

What this sequel mostly does wrong is relies too much on its first movie. It needlessly features same characters and actors from the first movie and the movie is filled with countless flashbacks of events that happened in the first movie. This is a real cheap way of film-making of course and quite annoying if you have already seen the first movie.

It's not being very original on its own and it most importantly is ineffective as an horror movie. The way the overall story progresses just isn't that interesting and often too predictable. There is also too little happening and when there is something happening it isn't being very effective, due to its build-up and overall story.

The movie has lots of characters in it, which you never really get to care about and you are just waiting for them to die. The movie is also basically the one killing after the other but none of them are really original or surprising enough to leave a lasting impression on the fans of the genre.

No tension, no excitement, no originality. No reason to ever watch this movie really.

4/10

Watch trailer

Ginî piggu 2: Chiniku no hana (1985) (V) Directed by Hideshi Hino





(Review originally written at 15 March 2009)

Compared to the first movie, this is is considerably better. It's done far more professional and has a better visual look over it, making this movie more convincing and compelling to watch than the first movie from the Za ginipiggu-series. This movie really looks- and is made like a movie, rather than a cheap and lame snuff-wannabee.

The concept remains the same though; A young woman is being kidnapped and held captive, with the pure purpose to torture her in as many different ways as imaginable.

It's a rather graphic and gory movie, with some convincing effects but unfortunately not so convincing sound effects. Sometimes the sound effects are unintentionally hilarious, which does take away some of the power of the movie its visuals.

Of course it's a totally pointless sadistic gory shocker but the fans of gore simply don't need more. The movie for them will be a memorable and 'enjoyable' experience.

The movie is quite short and also the torturing itself is ended pretty quickly when the torturer simply decides to switch over to dismembering his victim pretty early on. The movie could had worked out more interesting and intriguing had it been a bit longer and taken some more time to build up to its 'climax'.

Better than the first one but still a pretty pointless movie to watch.

6/10

Top