Style2

Knightriders (1981) Directed by George A. Romero



A George A. Romero movie starring both Ed Harris and Tom Savini as medieval bikers? That's a pretty obscure sounding movie and I also hadn't even heard of this movie before. It's also definitely a bit of an offbeat movie, though unfortunately it's not really as fun or interesting as it all sounds though.

This actually is the first movie that George A. Romero made after his hit movie "Dawn of the Dead", which seems like a pretty odd choice. I mean, going from zombies to medieval bikers seems like a pretty unusual, though certainly original step. It also wasn't quite as successful as his previous movie though, so he soon returned to the world of horror and zombies after doing this one.

The movie itself...well, it exists. I mean, it's certainly one you can easily do without. It doesn't offer enough of anything. Not enough entertainment, not enough excitement and not enough story, which seems like an odd thing for a 145 minutes long movie. So what was supposed to be the big 'conflict' in this movie? Ed Harris his character's struggles to keep the troop together and their way of life going? It really isn't ever all that interesting or engaging.

Perhaps it's true that I simply was expecting something differently from this movie. Something more adventurous, something more fun, something more action-filled or something more 'silly' perhaps. The movie feels a bit too serious for its concept, without ever featuring any deep or thought provoking themes in it.

It's still good enough to watch though, which mainly is due to its original and unusual concept. Seeing bikers dressed up as medieval knights, performing at their own renaissance fair, jousting at each other is a pretty unique sight, to say the very least. Especially when their leader and 'king' is being played by Ed Harris, in an early role for him, alongside some Romero regulars such as Ken Foree and Tom Savini. It also features some pretty good stunt work and nice comedy in it, just never enough of any of it.

All in all a still perfectly watchable little movie, though it's nothing too special, fun or thrilling to watch, in my opinion.

6/10

Watch trailer

Nightmare (1981) Directed by Romano Scavolini



This is a pretty decent early slasher, that's not a particularly well made movie but an enjoyable enough one for the fans of the genre.

It's a very cheap looking- and therefor also kind of trashy movie. Yet, this at the same time gives the movie a eerie type of feeling to it. With its atmosphere, this movie actually feels more like a '70's productions, rather than one from the '80's. And who knows. Maybe this movie was indeed shot in the '70's but not released until a couple of years later. You just never know with these obscure, little, cheap genre flicks.

But perhaps it's simply true that this movie feels like a good 'old fashioned' slasher flick because it got directed by an Italian, who pretty much invented and perfected the slasher genre further, during the '70's. And indeed, this movie truly has an 'Italian vibe' to it as well, with some of its shots, killings and use of blood and gore. It really goes over-the-top with its blood and gore at times but that's all part of the reason why these movies are often so much fun.

And I had a pretty good time with this movie as well but I still can't call at a very good one too. It's a bit too messy and simplistic for that. It's too random at times and not everything feels connected to each other. The first half of the movie is for instance totally different from the second half, that also features mostly different characters in it and is taking a different approach to the story. Normally these movies tend to get worse as they go along but in this case, the movie is actually getting better and better, as it's heading toward its ending.

The movie is mainly a slasher but it's being a whole of different other things as well. There are all different types of horror to be found in this movie, which also does add to the messy and random feeling of it but also still works out well for the movie at times. There are some genuinely good and well build up horror moments in this movie, especially when it's still being a mysterious one and one that focuses purely on its psychotic killer.

Not a great movie by any means but still a good and 'interesting' one for the slasher lovers out there and those who enjoy trashy, cheap looking genre movies from the '80's, done Italian style.

6/10

Watch trailer

The Howling (1981) Directed by Joe Dante



It's an original enough movie but certainly not the best werewolf movie I have ever seen.

Well, this movie isn't doing an awful lot wrong but at the same time it still gives you the feeling it could have been a whole lot better. Perhaps the movie was too much focused on doing something new with werewolves and tried to be original with its concept, only to forget about its actual story.

There were some things I was really liking about the movie its story though. Thing I for instance really liked about it was how it slowly transformed from a normal and very typical serial killer type of horror/thriller into a more classic monster movie type of horror. I don't think I'm spoiling much by saying that at some point werewolves start to show up in this movie. After all, just look at the movie its cover and read its title...spoils everything from the get go. I definitely would have preferred not knowing at all what this movie was all about. This would have enhanced the movie its tension, mystery and horror significantly!

It was obvious to me that director Joe Dante must have really liked the werewolf movies from the '40's (perhaps that's also why John Carradine is in it?) and also used it as an inspiration for this movie. There are numerous references to it throughout and it tries to mimic some of its atmosphere, story beats and characters, which shouldn't be a big surprise, seeing how between the '40's and 1981, when this movie got done, not an awful lot of big or popular werewolf movies got made, so he didn't have much else to go by. As a matter of fact, it wasn't until this movie that the sub genre started to become popular again and more werewolf movies started to emerge, not long after this movie became an unexpected hit.

Thing I didn't like that much about its story was how it felt a little bit underdeveloped at times. The movie seemed to have plenty of ideas in it, that too often, don't amount to anything. Some potentially interesting side-plots were going absolutely nowhere and also got abandoned after a short while. I for instance would have loved the movie to focus some more on the Patrick Macnee character, who seemed like a pretty interesting one but hardly got used in the movie.

It's a flat out horror and monster movie but the movie at the same time still attempts to give the movie a sense of realism. At times it got in the way of the movie its horror and it just wasn't always working for me. I certainly liked the movie best when it was going all out with its horror and werewolf moments! This not in the least was due to the werewolves' impressive looks. The effects and makeup used in this movie, done by Rob Bottin and Rick Baker, looked absolutely fantastic. The transformation scenes were pretty impressive as well, especially when considering this is an '80's movie, that only had a very small budget to spend.

It's not entirely without humor but for most part this is a very 'serious' and straightforward, dark, horror movie by Joe Dante. A bit surprising perhaps, since he's better known for doing lighter type of movies. Even his other horror movies are much lighter ones, such as the original 1978 "Piranha" and the two much loved Gremlins movies. So know what to expect- or more importantly, not to except from this movie!

I liked watching this movie, mostly because it was an original and effective one within its genre but it's certainly not as great as it potentially could have been!

7/10

Watch trailer

The Prowler (1981) Directed by Joseph Zito



This movie is a disappointment, mostly because it has such an awesome sounding concept to it. It's only something that sounds good on paper though, since the execution of it all is far from awesome, exciting or original.

Just purely by watching this movie you could tell that director Joseph Zito just wasn't a very good genre director. He did an extremely poor job with handling its concept and with building up its tension. Even the killings are disappointing in this movie, while this normally would be something that still could make a movie like this worthwhile, even when the rest of the movie isn't being very good.

It just does absolutely nothing with its concept. It sounds so promising; a killer, seemingly randomly killing people in a WW II outfit but an annoying and weird aspect to begin with is that the outfit isn't even WW II-looking at all and for some odd reason he uses a pitchfork as his weapon of choice. It's such an odd combination, that just doesn't make any sense and also never gets explained.

That's another problem of the movie; nothing ever gets explained. Instead of creating a mystery and a whole back-story, the movie is simply being a whodunit, Scooby-Doo style, that doesn't focus at all on the why's and by the end the movie only leaves more why's. As a matter of fact, at least a Scooby-Doo episode always explain at the end why the person committed all of the monstrosities. This movie does nothing of that sort.

But it does not only handles its killer poorly; also the rest of its characters remains underdeveloped. Of course this isn't being anything too uncommon for a slasher but at least most slashers feature a good and likable enough main character in it, while this movie only features a bunch of boring looking and acting people in it, you just couldn't have cared less for. Besides, it only has an handful of characters in it, so 'guessing' who the killer is shouldn't be too hard for anyone.

There is being absolutely nothing about the story that ever makes this movie stand out. Just like its characters, everything else in it also remains extremely underdeveloped and the little stuff that it tries to do is being extremely formulaic all.

This just is a bad, bad slasher, I'm sad to say.

4/10

Watch trailer

The Burning (1981) Directed by Tony Maylam





(Review originally written at 29 September 2009)

Well, slasher flicks set at a camp aren't exactly the most original movies around and also just aren't among the best. As far as the genre goes the movie is decent enough though and offers plenty to please its genre fans.

Problem with this movie perhaps is its build up. Now there is nothing wrong with a slow and steady build up but this movie takes a lot of time building things up. It takes a while before the slasher elements and horror really kicks in but overall the movie is still good and interesting enough to hold your interest throughout. This is because the movie features quite a lot of character, who are all sort of fun and likable or not very likable in their own way.

As a slasher the movie is being pretty gory in parts, though by todays standards it's also quite fake looking all. It nevertheless is being quite straight-forward with its violence and it features lots of bloods and horror effects. For most part the movie is not being very original or surprising but yet the movie still has its moments in it, which mostly involves its horror.

Quite funny how many big well known actors seemed to start out their career with playing parts in horror movies, mostly during the '80's. This movie for instance features a young Holly Hunter and Jason Alexander. Jason Alexander's part is quite big actually and it was fun to see him act in the same sort of way already like he later would in his career, only with hair this time.

A good enough movie to watch but not really interesting or original enough to stand out within its genre.

6/10

Watch trailer

Halloween II (1981) Directed by Rick Rosenthal





(Review originally written at 5 September 2009)

Well, to be honest the movie was not as bad as I had feared, mainly because of the reason that it had some entertainment value in it.

It's obvious that this movie got made purely for entertainment and without much else intentions. The story is simple but sort of fun and adventurous. This doesn't take away anything of the fact that it's still a pretty poorly made movie.

It's a bit clumsy looking, as you can often expect from an Italian genre movie like this one. In it's era many movies like this got made and you can say that the Italians sort of founded the genre in the '50's. It's all muscles and costumes, without ever giving the movie much flair but still special typical genre feeling and atmosphere.

Of course it's all rather cheap looking, with lame effects and cardboard looking sets and props. It makes the movie itself also quite lame to watch at times but again, I feel that this also adds to the movie its entertainment value.

I just wished they would had spend some more time on the movie its script. The movie now feels as if the movie got shot with only a halve completed script. Lots of things often don't make sense and some things feel incomplete and unfinished. It's not a very satisfying movie to watch. Especially toward the end the movie turns awkward. It starts to become more and more messy and things start to make less and less sense. You'll loose interest about halve way through the movie, which just doesn't make this a very comfortable movie to watch.

It isn't completely horrible but still pretty bad nevertheless.

3/10

Watch trailer

Dark Night of the Scarecrow (1981) (TV) Directed by Frank De Felitta

-->



(Review originally written at 11 November 2008)

*** This review may contain spoilers ***


What this movie does well is not showing too much. This could had easily turned into a cheesy monster-flick, in which you see a guy dressed up as a scarecrow killing people. The scarecrow actually isn't shown until the very end it is being implied often in the movie that the killer is not a ghostly scarecrow rising from the grave to take revenge upon his killers but a normal person of flesh and blood who has their own motivation to kill the bad men.

It relies further more on a very simple plot but due to its approach it works out original and effective nevertheless. Not that the movie is a very scary one but it still turns into a creepy and atmospheric one, when you're not fully knowing what is going to happen next. The movie is definitely less worth and cheesy than its title at first sight might suggest.

You could say that the movie doesn't show much and doesn't has any gore in it because it's a cheaply made for TV movie. That might be so but however the movie simply uses this to its own benefit. In this case less is more within this movie.

Director Frank De Felitta actually directed a couple of more made for TV horror movies like this throughout his career and it's short of a shame that he never really broke through. Although I don't know if his movies would had been better though if they had a bigger budget and a global world wide theatrical release. He actually made one big movie in his career, starring Sharon Stone which did flopped.

The movie doesn't feature the world's best actors (though Charles Durning has done some good things throughout his career) but this suits the movie and its atmosphere and style well. It is a surprising sight though seeing Marlon Brando's older sister Jocelyn Brando in this. It also was weird seeing Larry Drake in this, as a retarded man, who can only think and act like a child. It was weird seeing him as this, since Larry Drake to me while always be that tough criminal Durant from the "Darkman" movies.

A movie really worth watching.

7/10

Watch trailer

Student Bodies (1981) Directed by Mickey Rose & Michael Ritchie

-->



(Review originally written at 20 October 2008)

Who would had ever known that this obscure little unknown horror comedy would be such a fun one to watch!


This is a real enjoyable horror spoof, from the period before spoofs even became popular. The movie is so silly with its comedy that it becomes really hilarious to watch in parts. The movie is filled with some crazy but real likable characters and some really well written comical dialog, which perhaps made me laugh the most.


It's strange watching this obviously low budget production from Paramount Pictures, with obviously not the most talented or experienced people involved, both in front as well as behind the camera. It actually turned out that the reason why this movie got made in the first place was because that at the time there was a writer's strike in Hollywood (yes, it's not just something of the present) and in order to still release some movies and gain some money, Paramount Pictures funded a couple of non-union films, of which this was one. So under any other normal circumstances this movie would had probably never been made. It really looks and feels like an amateur made film but this is obviously also part of the reason why this movie has grown into becoming such a cult-classic in certain circles over the years.


It's a real silly comedy, made in the same style as some present day popular genre comedies. So yes in a way "Student Bodies" seems really ahead of its time. The movie features mostly simple humor to enjoy and the movie obviously isn't one to take serious in any way.


The movie spoofs some horror classics in parts but "Student Bodies" can still mostly seen as an original production with a story of its own. Well story...it's not like it's anything too great written. The movie is kept simple at all times. Unfortunately the movie sort of starts 'loosing it' toward the end. It's a real shame, since to me it prevented this movie from being a true 'must-see' and it made it quite embarrassingly bad to watch when the story seems to be suddenly all over the place.


The movie is filled with some crazy and really funny characters but of course the one that really stands out is Malvert the janitor, played by a guy only known as The Stick. It's an amazingly odd man who is very tall and a little over one hundred pounds, so you can imaging a bit how he looks like. He's incredibly sluggish and moves around like he's made out of elastic and has no bones in his body. No one knows who this guy is, or what is real name is or what he's doing this present day and time.


The rest of the actors are also all big unknowns, with the exception of Richard Belzer, although he is never shown on screen, at least not his face (he plays the killer, known as The Breather, for the obvious reasons). He's a real cult actor due to his personality and the knowledge of his presence alone in this movie is already amusing.


Despite not being brilliant I can still really recommend this movie and can insure you that it's a real hilarious one in a lot of parts.


7/10


Watch trailer

An American Werewolf in London (1981) Directed by John Landis

-->



(Review originally written at 10 October 2008)

What this movie does very well, and what it is so well known for, is the fact that it perfect blends the comedy with its horror, without letting the one element weaken the other. Because for instance in lot of other horror/comedies, the comedy really weakens the horror. It makes them ineffective as scary and gory ones but this really isn't the case with "An American Werewolf in London".


Perhaps this is because the comedy within this movie is more subtle and B-movie like. The movie doesn't take itself too seriously which allows the movie its comedy to work out so effective and subtle. John Landis obviously made the movie deliberately B-movie like in parts, especially by picking not the best actors and by not giving them the best dialog imaginable. It on top of that features some great typical B-movie like moments, which perhaps is only truly notable for the genre fans and most other people will probably write it off as lame and simplistic.


Just because the movie features humor and has B-movie elements in it doesn't mean that this movie is ineffective as an horror movie. In that genre this movie also really stands out. It does this by featuring some great imaginative and gory looking sequences. but it also does this not in the least with its make-up effects. Especially the dream sequences within the movie are quite memorable. This movie was actually the first to receive and Oscar for its make-up. Before this, best make-up wasn't even a category at the Oscar's, believe it or not. But thanks to this movie the academy realized that this was a profession to take seriously and to include in the award ceremony. The award of course went to legendary make-up artist Rick Baker. It was the first out of 6 Oscar's he has so far received during his career.


The movie is actually surprisingly gory. It's just not something you would expect from an horror/comedy but this movie is basically just as gory, if not gorier, than most other 'serious' genre movies. Director John Landis actually now days is surprised how gory this movie actually is when he looks back at it.


Of course the movie doesn't feature a too complicated plot (luckily so) but it nevertheless know to pick an original approach with its story and all. It doesn't feature an usual werewolf plot in which the victim is battling his transformation during full moon and is plotting to kill the werewolf that bite him in order to lift the curse. I won't tell what the actual plot of the movie is, since it will probably spoil to much but fact is that it's original, which also means that the movie doesn't end in a typical 'Hollywood-way'.


When watching this movie it actually becomes more painfully obvious how bad its sequel "An American Werewolf in Paris", which got made 16 years(!) after this movie, actually is. It tries to achieve the same thing as this movie, by picking the same type of approach but in moments like that it becomes obvious that directing is a real important job and that some directors are simply more talented than others. Anthony Waller just obviously ain't no John Landis! John Landis would also later impress with the legendary Michael Jackson video-clip for the hit song 'Thriller'. The special make-up effects again came from Rick Baker. The clip definitely shows similarities to this movie in especially its style.


A great as well as enjoyable unique werewolf movie!


8/10


Watch trailer

Top