Style2

Oblivion (2013) Directed by Joseph Kosinski



This is nothing too great and nothing too original either but it simply remains one capably made movie, for the mainstream audience to enjoy.

The more hardened science-fiction movie lover can nitpick this movie to death really. And yes, I also had more than just a few problems with this movie but I simply took this movie for what it was and I also have to say that for a more mainstream type of audience, this is a wonderful big budget science-fiction adventure. It's like the movie "Moon", only with a much bigger budget and far more spectacle involved.

It's as if the film-makers initially wanted to go for a more 'quiet' and realistic, subtle approach but somewhere during production it got out of hand- and especially once Tom Cruise got himself involved, the studio interfered and demanded that the movie would have to feature some more and bigger action in it. Really, when you look back at it you really have to say that the movie its story didn't need most of the action that was in it. Not that it feels terribly out of place, or ever takes you out of the movie but I still strongly believe I would have liked this movie better without all of the action and explosions and such. A true science-fiction movie, with the emphasis on the science, instead of the fiction, as now is the case.

Like I said, this movie is like "Moon", in the sense that it's about a working man in space (or well, somewhere high in the Earth's atmosphere in this case), working for the 'big boss', who slowly starts to learn about his own true identity. But having said that; this movie is being like a ton of other science-fictions as well. It isn't as original or even clever as it likes to present itself (it confuses you, rather than ever truly trying to surprise or impress you with its writing) but like I also said before, this isn't going to bother the more average movie goer. They probably still be surprised at some of the movie its twists and the approach it's taking with its story and some of its characters at times. In in that regard, this also truly is far from the worst science- fiction movie to have come out in recent years. As a matter of fact, it took me back to the days when a new science-fiction movie was still something special and impressed you with its look and approach. And despite everything, I still do admire this movie for its look and approach! It isn't just your typical, average Tom Cruise vehicle and it actually keeps on challenging the viewers with its story. Please don't watch this movie expecting to get some brainless, overblown, science-fiction action flick, or you may end up feeling disappointed with this movie.

Still, at the same time the movie is handling its story poorly at times. Quite poorly to be frank. It does a poor job at handling certain plot lines and characters. You feel that the Morgan Freeman character and his band of misfits for instance should have played a much bigger part- that also was far more important for the movie. After all, this is where the TRUE story kicks in, without spoiling too much about it. They however don't show up until the movie is halfway done already and it almost gets handled like some sort of afterthought. The emphasis never gets put on any other storyline but the one for the Tom Cruise character, even while clearly much bigger and more important things are happening around him. But also the Tom Cruise character himself doesn't really get handled in a very good and effective way. Tom Cruise is a great actor but his character in this movie isn't exactly a very memorable one. You feel that the movie should have given his character and some of the plot lines some more depth, also in order to truly feel involved with it. Basically everything in this movie remains underdeveloped and in some regards it truly feels too shallow as a movie, as if it also didn't want you to feel for any of its characters. Maybe it all was intentional, to give the movie deliberately a sort of sterile feeling but anyway, it doesn't work out all that pleasant or effective for this particular movie.

Besides, the pacing seems a bit off at times. Sometimes it's too slow for its own good, while at others it glosses over a whole bunch of other stuff that seem important but never get handled as such by the actual movie.

Overall, I still have more positive than negative feelings toward this movie movie, so it definitely did a lot of things right, despite all criticism. It was an enjoyable movie to watch and even during the movie its slower moments I still remained interested in it, at all times. Despite not being the most original science-fiction movie out there, story- and concept-wise, you still don't know what is going to happen next and are anxious to find out.

It of course also is a great looking movie, which should come as no surprise, seeing how much it cost to make. I'm not always too impressed with movies that rely heavily on computer effects but I just can't say anything negative about this movie its look or effects. I simply liked it and was enthralled with the movie its world and its overall look. And another thing I also would like to mention; I liked the movie its sound effects! It's something that perhaps is a bit underrated within the science-fiction genre at times but good and original sound effects can truly help to create a world- and sometimes even universe of its own.

So, some negative and some positive things to say about this movie but overall I strongly do feel that this is a perfectly watchable science-fiction flick for the more mainstream audience, as long as they know what they are in for.

7/10

Watch trailer

Trailer #3: Oblivion (2013)

A court martial sends a veteran soldier to a distant planet, where he has to destroy the remains of an alien race. The arrival of an unexpected traveler causes him to question what he knows about the planet, his mission, and himself. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Joseph Kosinski
Starring: Tom Cruise, Morgan Freeman, Andrea Riseborough and others
Current release date: April 19, 2013

International trailer: Oblivion (2013)

A court martial sends a veteran soldier to a distant planet, where he has to destroy the remains of an alien race. The arrival of an unexpected traveler causes him to question what he knows about the planet, his mission, and himself. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Joseph Kosinski
Starring: Tom Cruise, Morgan Freeman, Andrea Riseborough and others
Current release date: April 19, 2013

Jack Reacher (2012) Directed by Christopher McQuarrie



Sure, of course this is a good movie but is it also one that stands out in its genre or attempts anything new? Not really in my opinion, or at least not enough.

As a matter of fact, once you strip this movie down to its core, which is its story, it's just a very standard crime story, cleverly disguised as an action flick. It's all capably and cleverly done but it doesn't prevent the movie from being somewhat predictable and also not without its slower 'detective' moments. Oh well, perhaps it's simply true I have seen too many crime related stuff in my life already, so it's hard to truly impress or surprise me with something and so perhaps it's also true other people are going to enjoy this movie a whole lot more as I did.

Not that I hated this movie of course. It does more things right than wrong and has plenty of good and interesting aspects about it. Thing I liked about the movie is that it's one that takes a more serious and realistic approach but at the same time doesn't forget to be entertaining as well. It feels like a well balanced movie in that regard and because of its approach you feel more involved with its story and characters as well.

And the main character of Jack Reacher is absolutely a great one. He's the tough, smart, witty sort of character that is easy to like and someone that the viewers want to identify themselves with. He's both a believable action-hero, as well as a smart detective kind of guy, charismatically portrayed by Tom Cruise. It's not the usual type of 'hero' he normally plays in movies. He's tougher and a bit more dark as well, without ever crossing the line and become a bad guy. You're always on his side, no matter how many laws he breaks in this movie.

Part of the reason why the character also works out well is due to its dialog. As much as I could complain about the story, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the movie its dialog, written by Christopher McQuarrie, who also directed the movie. Part of the movie its atmosphere comes from the movie its dialog really and besides often provides the movie with plenty of pace, even when not an awful lot is happening.

Far from perfect but a still perfectly watchable genre movie! No doubt that we'll get some sequels in the future.

7/10

Watch trailer

Trailer: Oblivion (2013)

A court martial sends a veteran soldier to a distant planet, where he has to destroy the remains of an alien race. The arrival of an unexpected traveler causes him to question what he knows about the planet, his mission, and himself. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Joseph Kosinski
Starring: Tom Cruise, Morgan Freeman, Andrea Riseborough and others
Current release date: April 19, 2013

Trailer #2: Jack Reacher (2012)

A homicide investigator digs deeper into a case involving a trained military sniper who shot five random victims. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Christopher McQuarrie
Starring: Tom Cruise, Rosamund Pike, Richard Jenkins and others
Current release date: December 21, 2012

Trailer: Jack Reacher (2012)

A homicide investigator digs deeper into a case involving a trained military sniper who shot five random victims. Based on a book in Lee Child's crime series. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Christopher McQuarrie
Starring:Tom Cruise, Rosamund Pike, Robert Duvall and others
Current release date:December 21, 2012

Rock of Ages (2012) Directed by Adam Shankman



No doubt this movie was an attempt at bringing back the good old fashioned rock musical to the big screen but it really for most part is being a failed attempt.

I didn't expected a full blown musical but make no mistake about it; this is really a musical, in which its characters occasionally suddenly burst out into singing. It's not exactly my favorite thing to watch but as it turned out, this was actually the least problem I had with this movie.

The singing and music in the movie is actually quite good and also what makes this movie still somewhat enjoyable to watch. Granted that there are a bit too many songs in it at times but overall I can't really complain or so many bad things about it.

The foremost problem of this movie remains its script, that is being far too formulaic and simplistic. Besides, it has too many different characters in it, with as a result that movie can feel a bit messy at times and most definitely not focused well enough. It's also a problem that its main story is about the least interesting out of all the different stories and the same goes for its two main leads, played by Julianne Hough and Diego Boneta.

Yes, the movie has so many big names and great stars in it but yet it decides on featuring two big unknown in the leading roles. They just aren't very interesting or fun to watch and besides their whole love thing just wasn't all that convincing. Why do these two persons fall in love exactly? There just isn't really enough chemistry between the two of them and they seem more focused on performing their songs.

The supporter cast, with actors such as Tom Cruise, Alec Baldwin, Russell Brand, Paul Giamatti, Catherine Zeta-Jones and Bryan Cranston involved, is definitely way better and is still what's saving the movie and keeping it a somewhat fun and watchable enough one. But again, there are just too many characters in this movie, which each their own thing going on and it also doesn't help much that every actor in this movie acts as if she/he is in their entirely own movie. It makes some of the plot lines and characters also feel terribly out of place, which also can be said for its humor.

You could say that the movie its humor is being a bit too goofy at times, which also can be blamed on its lazy writing, that was uninspired and without any true original or creative moments. It also all really makes the movie feel needlessly overlong. There just was no good reason for this movie to be about 2 hours long and they could and should had shortened it with at least 30 minutes.

Not horrible or a movie that I hated but there is nothing about it that is being ever truly great or successful at what it is trying to achieve.

5/10

Watch trailer

Valkyrie (2008) Directed by Bryan Singer





(Review originally written at 15 August 2009)

Well, this movie was a bit of a disappointment. It had all of the right ingredients in it needed to make a great and interesting movie with but yet it really wasn't one. It had Tom Cruise, Bryan Singer as director, a fascinating and a based on true events story but the movie just made some wrong choices in the process.

The movie really isn't handling its story very well. Instead of telling the story honest and with respect it tells it spectacular and overblown. The movie is too Hollywood-like for its story and the real story and characters deserved a better treatment.

But even so, the movie is trying to be Hollywood-like, it yet doesn't even fully succeed in this neither. The movie just isn't spectacular enough to watch for this. There aren't any big shoot-outs or a spectacular ending in which everything reaches a conclusion. There often is more talking than action, so I actually have no clue at which audiences they were aiming. Singer made the same mistake before with "Superman Returns".

The movie also made a bad choice with its casting. Nothing wrong with Tom Cruise in his role, even though its also far from his most memorable one but casting some very British actors in some very German roles was simply a horrible choice. The accents did really bother and it was often quite laughable hearing a high placed German commander talking with a very thick British accent. Especially Hitler's voice really bothered me. Sure, the actor that played him (David Bamber) looked well enough like him but he sounded absolutely nothing like him at all. For all I cared they should had called in something to dub his voice but they didn't even bothered with it. It's a shame that most actors feel so out of place within this movie, since the movie does certainly feature some great actors in it, such as of course Tom Cruise but also Bill Nighy, Kenneth Branagh, Tom Wilkinson, Terence Stamp and Thomas Kretschmann, among many others.

It's of course a good looking movie and it's also put together professionally with its directing, editing, cinematography, music and such and it also certainly wasn't a cheap movie to make but this simply does not make the movie better or more interesting to watch. It just prevents it from being a total disaster to watch and gives the movie more than enough to still consider this simply a watchable one.

6/10

Watch trailer

Tropic Thunder (2008) Directed by Ben Stiller





(Review originally written at 21 March 2009)

Modern comedies are starting to get a bit tiresome and it's often simply too much of the same. "Tropic Thunder" really is not like that and takes an original approach to the genre, with a great original story and a dream-team of actors.

Ben Stiller movies are often too much Ben Stiller movies, which means that the movies focus and rely too much on him. Not that he's bad, on the contrary really but it's also a bit tiresome, especially now days, when he appears in in the main role in comedies, two times a year, or so. Thank goodness that in this movie he is being supported by some truly fine actors, of which some of them really aren't that likely that appear in a comedy. I'm of course talking about Robert Downey Jr., who simply is just brilliant in this movie. It wasn't just for nothing that he received an Oscar nomination for his role in this movie. He really deserved it. Also unexpectedly great is Tom Cruise. He once proofs to be more than just a great actor, who can handle different genres easily. The movie further more stars fine actors such as Jack Black, Nick Nolte and Matthew McConaughey.

It's a movie that's simply greatly being written and directed. It more picks the approach of a serious big multi-million Hollywood production, which enhances the movie being an Hollywood-satire even more. If you're a bit familiar with movie-making and everything surrounding it you'll find the movie to be even more funny and amusing that the average person.

It's also not a lame comedy, with lame jokes and such but it's actually a quite clever movie, that is greatly written. It's not a comedy that constantly tries to make you laugh but it's being more subtle with its humor but yet not without it's typical modern comedy touches to it. Some people might find this movie to be less funny than if got advertised as but its humor is simply just more in its little things and the pompous and over-the-top way this movie got made in. With its $92,000,000 budget this was quite a daring project, that in the end more than paid off.

8/10

Watch trailer

Days of Thunder (1990) Directed by Tony Scott





(Review originally written at 3 December 2006)

This is your typical average sport/racing movies, that offers very little surprises but is well made and has an excellent cast.

The team behind "Top Gun", director Tony Scott, producers Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer and of course actor Tom Cruise. team up again for this movie. No wonder that this movie is often referred to as; "Top Gun" on the race track. Also the story shows several similarities between the two movies.

So no, the story really is the strongest aspect of the movie. It's simple, formulaic for its genre and it offers very little surprises. Still the movie is good enough to watch, due to its fine directing, visual style and acting. The movie is filled with some great and well known actors.

Tom Cruise is great in this early heroic role as a rookie NASCAR driver with big ambitions. But even better and the one that steals the show in the movie is Robert Duvall. The movie further more also features Nicole Kidman, Randy Quaid, Cary Elwes, Michael Rooker, Fred Dalton Thompson and John C. Reilly but most of their roles gets muddled into the story and 'action'. The movie is just a couple of minutes too short to give all the fine actors enough room to truly shine and flesh out their characters.

The love-story in the movie between the main characters played by Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman doesn't seem to add enough to the story and movie in general. Nevetheless they share some great chemistry on the screen and still provide some good and interesting scene's. No wonder, they fall in love during the shooting on this movie and married the same year but divorced again nearly 11 years later.

Luckily the movie is not all about the love and drama. The movie also still focuses on the racing elements of the movie, which provides the movie with some well filmed 'action' driving sequence, though most of the images are obviously stock footage from real NASCAR races. Nevertheless those sequences and the movie in general should be enough to please the race fans and of course NASCAR fans in particular.

A good formulaic genre movie but perhaps for racing fans and/or fans of Tom Cruise only.

6/10

Watch trailer

Mission: Impossible III (2006) Directed by J.J. Abrams





(Review originally written at 2 November 2006)

People complained about "Mission: Impossible II" how incredibly simple the story was (and of course I agree on that) but in my opinion the story of "Mission: Impossible III" is even simpler and weaker. "Mission: Impossible III" doesn't even tell its story by its actors, or script but rather with the one big action sequences after the other. All style but no substance.

I'm probably the only person on the planet who fully understood an enjoyed "Mission:Impossible" and I also enjoyed watching "Mission:Impossible II", mainly thanks to its wonderful directed action. I expected a lot from "Mission: Impossible III", especially when it started to receive positive and even raving reviews in the media. In the end the movie didn't deliver. The action is great but the build up of it all and the story- and storytelling is too lacking to make this an enjoyable must-see action spectacle.

This movie really is basically the one big action sequences after the other. The movie doesn't allow us to catch our breath for a moment and before you fully can process what happened you're already in the middle of the next big fast action sequence. I'm sure this was all perfectly good and impressive to see on the big screen but on the small screen it's not good enough to compensate for the movie its story and other flawed elements. It's too paced and too lacking in development or depth. The movie jumps from the one sequence and location to the other. We're in Germany and before we know it in America then China and back again, etcetera. It also sort of makes you wonder why the movie had to be set at locations spread all over the world. It doesn't really add anything to the movie its story or atmosphere. It rather seems like a waste of money and it also doesn't always make the movie flow well.

In the movie the story really plays no part in the movie. The movie is lacking proper development and the few story-elements that are present in the movie are far from well executed.

When watching this movie it becomes that director J.J. Abrams only has experience with work for TV. He tells this movie as a TV series episode, meaning that everything happens quick without giving it ever much depth or time to think. Basically everything that happens in this movie and in the story is build up in 5 minutes and ended in that same 5 minutes again. This unfortunately also is the case in the disappointing finale. This is the sort of build up used for television series but for movies it just doesn't work well. I'm afraid that J.J. Abrams will always keep directing movies like that and as long as this remains the case, I'll probably not become a fan of him.

I'm no Tom Cruise hater, on the contrary. In my opinion he is the biggest and best action hero star of the moment. What other actor makes such great action movies and delivers an Oscar worthy performance as well? He plays the role of Ethan Hunt for the third time in this movie and in this one he is the most emotional and humane on, since he is attacked on his personal feelings. This also was already the case in "Mission: Impossible" but in this movie even more. It does provide the movie with some depth but this isn't always handled well. It makes some of the sequences feel out of place and in contrast with the rest of the movie. Philip Seymour Hoffman plays an excellent villain role mainly because well, he is such a great actor. He absolutely steals the show in most of the sequences that he is in. His character is however lacking a proper background and motivations, which makes his character feel flat and far from interesting. The rest of the movie seems pretty weirdly cast with roles for Billy Crudup, Simon Pegg and Jonathan Rhys Meyers, not the mostly likely actors to appear in a big action movie (same goes for Philip Seymour Hoffman by the way) but they all fit their roles well and are an enrichment for the movie. Laurence Fishburne is also quite good in his role. Ving Rhames reprises his role of Luther Stickell for the third time and this time is most definitely the least interesting one.

Of course the big and well made action sequences are reasons why this movie is still better than your average action-flick. The big budget for the movie is obvious and spend on lots of big explosions, gun fights and chase sequences. The action movie lovers will not complain. The special effects are also good but nothing Oscar worthy. They certainly don't look like 'an $150,000,000-movie' worthy.

The camera-work was good. I was quite fond of the shaky cam effects and they made the action sequences look even more spectacular. The musical score from new upcoming composer Michael Giacchino was also truly great. With this movie he proofs that he can handle big movies as well and just as good as the can handle popular games and television work. Hopefully he'll get the chance to do more projects like this one in the near future. An Oscar before 2010 for him?

Conclusion; If this was a TV-series episode it would had been one of the best ever but as a movie it simple falls short, mostly of some of the basic things.

6/10

Watch trailer

Interview with the Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles (1994) Directed by Neil Jordan





(Review originally written at 15 July 2006)

It of course sounds like a silly statement, calling this movie the most realistic vampire ever made, since its very safe to assume that vampires never really excited at all. But that's not what I mean by calling this movie realistic. I mean that it's detailed, it concentrates on the issues what it means to be a vampire, what will it do to you, what's the purpose, how to handle the immortality etcetera. It's far from your average every day vampire movie. It's stylish, detailed and full of deeper meanings and therefor provides us a realistic view at what it means to be a vampire.

The movie tells the epic tale of the vampire Louis (Brad Pitt). A vampire who still has a sense of decency and remorse, much to the annoyance of his 'maker' Lestat (Tom Cruise). Louis is full of questions by which he is torn- and that he wants answered. What follows is a realistic view in the world of vampires. It takes us to the sensual, almost erotic like, world of vampires but also shows us the dark and less pleasant side of the vampire world.

Above all "Interview with the Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles" is a very stylish made movie. The movie looks beautiful with nice looking sets and period costumes. Despite being full of deeper meanings and long, poetic like conversations, it yet still always manages to be interesting, as well as at times exciting.

What makes the story definitely work are the fine actors that portray the characters. We see Tom Cruise in a role we don't see him often enough in; that of a villainous character. He plays his character with style and delivers an unforgettable performance. He makes the character Lestat one of the best and most memorable vampires, next to father of all vampire. Dracula himself. I'm quite surprised that he didn't even got an Oscar-nod at least for his role. Also impressive was Kirsten Dunst in an early role. Also she, plays one of her best roles out of her career, at the age of 12. Other fine well known actors in this movie are Brad Pitt, Christian Slater, Antonio Banderas and Stephen Rea, who is a very underrated and underused actor in my opinion.

The beautiful Oscar nominated music is from Elliot Goldenthal, who unfortunately doesn't that often compose more scores like this one.

A vampire movie that doesn't concentrate on the formulaic stereotypical vampire movie elements but instead chooses a realistic approach with deeper meanings. Stylish movie with great performances, that is a must-see for every vampire fan.

8/10

Watch trailer

Top