Style2

I Spit on Your Grave (2010) Directed by Steven R. Monroe



Yes, I have seen the original movie this one is based on but it was ages ago and I actually remember very little about it. For some reason I also always mix it up with the 1972 Wes Craven movie "The Last House on the Left". I therefore also can't tell you how the two of them compare to each other but I can only assume that the original did a far better job with its concept and was a better and more effective movie, since I actually quite liked it, which I can't really say for this movie.

The truth is that older genre movies were always capable of getting away with far more stuff than any of the more recent genre movies. It was OK for older sorts of genre movies to be very simplistic and straightforward ones, as long as they were doing something special, which either could be something totally outrageous and crazy, gore, violence or sex-wise or something so stupid that it would actually work out as something entertaining and original to watch. Nowaways, people are not only more demanding but it's also really hard to stand out. Pretty much everything has been done in movies already, so how are you going to stand out with anything, nowadays? Well. this movie was clearly struggling with this as well and it in fact also stands out in absolutely no way at all!

That was the thing about the original 1978 version; It had a, at the time, greatly original concept, in which things got turned around and the victim became the tough, coldblooded, killer. Plus added to that; it was a woman! In a way it was a real female empowering movie. Can the same be said about this movie as well? Well, not really. It's just nothing more but another average 'torture porn' horror flick. That the characters who's inflicting most of the pain and causing the most death and destructing is a female, who's on a revenge streak, doesn't add all that much in this case and I believe there are multiple reasons for this.

One is the main lead itself, played by Sarah Butler. Now, I'm not saying she is a terrible actress but her character is a far too poorly developed one. It's hard to get behind her because of this and thing that also incredibly annoyed me was the fact that she was always wearing perfect looking makeup and had wonderful, clean looking, hair, even in the scenes she was supposed to look dirty and beaten. Things like this always distract me and take me out of a movie.

Another thing is that here you have a movie, in which the interesting- and standout moments should be the torture/gory scenes. Seriously, other than that the story has absolutely nothing to offer. It's a very simplistic, straightforward movie that's relying heavily on all of the gore and violence. Now, here's the problem with it; the gore and violence really isn't anything all that special or graphic to watch. A lot gets implied but very little is actually shown. So now that is taken away from this movie, what is left in it? Just some very average, run of the mill, type of genre stuff. The movie constantly tries very hard to shock you but it never really hits. Instead of feeling raw and realistic, things in this movie feel far too polished, making the gore and violence appear more tame and less effective as well.

Now, to be fair; as far as these type of movies go, this really isn't the worst one you could watch. It remains good looking, never gets boring and never gets offensively bad with anything. It's perfectly watchable actually, though you obviously are still far better off watching the 1978 original, that's also known under the title "Day of the Woman", that was doing far more interesting and effective things with its concept.

6/10

Watch trailer

Extracted (2012) Directed by Nir Paniry



This most definitely isn't the most original genre movie around but I do admit, that for of a movie of this sort and caliber, which such a low budget, this is a pretty good watch!

It's amazing how much this movie 'borrows' from other, better known, genre movies, such as "Inception" and "Minority Report", just to name the two most obvious ones. This all annoyed me at first but I have to give the movie some credit for coming up with plenty of good and original developments of their own as well. So while not being very original with its main concept, the movie still works out good and original enough thanks to its own story.

Other than that, it's still not the most involving and exciting movie to watch. This is a sort of movie that would had worked out much better with some better drama and characters involved. If I would had cared for any of that, this still would had been an absolutely great movie to watch, despite of everything else.

You sort of feel the film-makers went over their own heads at times and treated their project like something that was much more clever and groundbreaking than it in fact truly was. Not that the movie is pretentious but the movie does make things hard on itself at times, due to its approach. I actually do believe that with a more simplified approach, especially toward its ending, this potentially could had been a more involving and effective movie to watch.

And since this is a low budget production, it's also lacking any sort of action, which could had spiced things up a little bit more. The movie still has a good pace to it but one or two chase scenes/shootouts probably wouldn't had done this movie any harm.

It seriously is still a good enough watch, certainly better than expected but still not one that's worthy of too much praise.

6/10

Watch trailer

Top