Style2

Oz the Great and Powerful (2013) Directed by Sam Raimi



This probably was one of the more anticipated movies of 2013 because of its concept and director involved but does it also deliver? I would have to say no to that.

The movie is stuck somewhere between being a colorful fantasy movie for kids and an adult fairytale. It never really manages to find a good balance between its entertainment and its more dark and serious aspects. Not just with its story but also with its characters. All of the sidekicks are basically, childish, comical characters, of which most are CG animated as well. The 'human' characters are still the movie its main focus but it's just too bad that none of their story arcs ever convinces well enough.

Why would Oz want to be king of Oz instead of trying to get back to the real world? Why would Oz need a king in the first place? It's not like the land is in war or chaos. And why would the witches suddenly try to take control of Oz, once an adversary drops out of the air? They had plenty of time and opportunity before that, you would think. It are questions like this that the movie never answers. It doesn't handle its story well- or convincing enough and it's focusing on the wrong things at times.

It for instance also bothered me how this movie can basically more be seen as a romantic movie, with an underwhelming love-triangle kind of romance in it, as opposed to an entertaining, marveling, adventurous epic, set in a strange world, filled with fantasy objects and characters. Nothing against romance in movies of course (well, most of the time it doesn't bother me) but it just feels odd that it's the story its main focus, for most of the time. The main focus should have been on its adventure and entertaining aspects but the movie instead prefers to have other distractions to it, that divert from the movie its entertainment. I mean, why bother to spend $200,000,000 on sets and special effects, if you are not going to use it well and focus on other things instead. Things that you basically could have done for free as well!

OK, I'm of course somewhat exaggerating but point remains that the movie isn't half as adventurous and entertaining you would expect and hope for. It's the foremost reason why the movie feels like a slight disappointment.

It really reminded me off Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland", not just visually but also story-wise. It besides suffered from most of the same problems; it doesn't really ever uses its fantasy aspects in a very creative, impressive or entertaining way. The story and character motivations are too simplistic and shallow. Both movies attempt to be more serious and adult type of fairy tales but without ever pulling you in to its fantasy world, or without making you feel involved with any of the characters, that are in it. Both also really don't have a clear- or strong enough main conflict in it. It lets stuff just happen and expects its audience to simply go along with it. Well, I'm just not falling for that!

Perhaps the movie would had been better and more involving to watch for me, if it had a better main characters in it. I'm really not putting any of the blame on James Franco for this but his character isn't always written in the most sympathetic (after all, he's a con man) way and as mentioned earlier, there isn't really a good enough character motivation for his Oz character in this. The one moment he want to be king, the other he tries to get out from under it. The one moment he sympathizes with some of the movie its character, the other he is just being selfish. The story keeps doing stuff like this with his character, all throughout, making him just not the ultimate hero or right type of protagonist for this type of movie. He should have been a bigger anti-hero really. It would at least made him a more likable character and his story arch probably a more involving and convincing one as well.

But really, the same can be said for basically every character and actor in this. It's hard to say whether or not most of them are miscast in their roles, or if all the blame could be put on the movie its writing instead. I'm still leaning more toward the latter, knowing how great most of the actors in this normally are, in other movies.

A too shallow and not involving enough fantasy experience, that besides is lacking some good enough entertainment in it.

5/10

Watch trailer

Teaser trailer: Oz the Great and Powerful (2013)

Circus magician Oscar Diggs thinks he's hit the jackpot as he's transported to the Land of Oz, but his encounters with three witches and the problems facing Oz's inhabitants encourage him to become the great wizard they've been expecting. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Sam Raimi
Starring: James Franco, Michelle Williams, Rachel Weisz and others
Current release date: March 8, 2013

Trailer #2: Oz: The Great and Powerful (2013)

How the Wizard arrived in Oz and became the ruler. A prequel to The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Sam Raimi
Starring: James Franco, Michelle Williams, Rachel Weisz and others
Current release date: March 8, 2013

Trailer: Oz: The Great and Powerful (2013)

A prequel to The Wonderful Wizard of Oz that tells how the Wizard arrived in Oz became the ruler. From: IMDb.com

Directed by: Sam Raimi
Starring: James Franco, Michelle Williams, Rachel Weisz and others
Current release date: March 8, 2013

Species (1995) Directed by Roger Donaldson





(Review originally written at 26 May 2008)

For some reason I've always loved watching "Species", even though I very well realize that it isn't a particularly good movie. Still due to its approach and handling of a really unoriginal concept and story, the movie can be regarded as one of the best science-fiction movies from the '90's.

If you need to compare this movie to something, you can easily compare it to any of the "Alien"-movies. Of course over the years "Alien" and its sequel "Aliens" have been ripped-off countless times and film-makers often tried to cash in by making basically "Alien" and "Aliens" clones, using the same concept, settings, characters, locations, complete sequences and whatever more that it was that made these two science-fiction movies such an highly acclaimed success. Yes, in my opinion "Species" can definitely be seen as an "Alien" clone but out of all the movies that ever tried to rip off the "Alien" movies in any way possible, this is easily the best movie, that at times even makes you forget how unoriginal it actually truly is.

Also no big wonder that the movie should remind you of "Alien" at times, also since the alien in this movie got designed by the same man who designed the original alien for "Alien" and all of its sequels. So perhaps this is also part of the reason why you so easily can forgive this movie from ripping off "Alien" in parts.

It's a surprising movie from Roger Donaldson, who had never done any science-fiction or horror before and he also hasn't done any ever since. Donaldson is these days mostly known for directing more serious movies.

It's perhaps its horror that also makes this movie work out so well. The movie is not just a science-fiction movie about an alien on the loose but truly knows to create a dark moody atmosphere as well and puts in a couple of true great and effective horror moments, which makes the movie tense and in a way also unpredictable to watch, also since the movie is not too afraid to kill off its main characters.

There is also some gore in the movie that is good looking, with its often graphic killings. Also the make-up effects are great and the movie uses some early special effects, that especially for 1995 standards seem like pretty good ones, even though the movie itself somewhat feels and looks like a low budget production.

The movie makes a choice not to only follow the team that is called in to hunt down the alien but also shows things from the perspective of the alien herself. She's constantly learning things, which she uses to adapt and blend in and to eventually get what she wants. This approach gives "Species" a nice extra dimension. It's like "The Day the Earth Stood Still", only with a not so friendly alien.

The movie also has an amazing cast with actors such as Ben Kingsley, Michael Madsen, Alfred Molina, Forest Whitaker and Michelle Williams involved. Whenever I hear the name- or a thinking of Ben Kingsley, I'm not thinking about "Schindler's List" or "Ghandi" but I'm thinking about "Species". I don't now, I just find it to be a very amusing role by him, despite the fact that he plays his character totally death serious.

I love this movie!

8/10

Watch trailer

Prozac Nation (2001) Directed by Erik Skjoldbjærg




(Review originally written at 14 January 2007)

In all honesty I can't think of any reason why anyone should ever watch this movie.

I really think and feel, while watching this movie, that everyone involved with making this movie thought that they were making something Oscar-worthy. Besides, why else would so many stars had appeared in this movie? The movie tries to be very style-full in some of its sequences and with its style of directing but it only works laughable and distracting, since the story itself simply does not work out at all.

All that the movie does is give us a view in the life of a depressive student. Is this interesting to watch? No and for the following reason; the main character just isn't likable in her action and behaviors and she rather pushes the viewers away, then to provide them a look in what is going on in her mind. She remains too unpredictable and 'weird' for that. You just CAN'T have a good movie when the main character isn't likable and/or easy to identify with. That probably is the reason why mostly only persons who have suffered from a depression- or are still in the middle of one, still like watching this movie. They can relate to the main character and her actions and behavior. The 'healty' person just simply can't. The movie just doesn't allow it.

The movie seems to be lacking a purpose in what it is trying to tell or achieve. The movie is just ongoing rambling about a depression, without having a real conclusion or solution, even though the movie features an annoying 'all-knowning' voice-over.

If this movie already won't make you depressive while watching it, then surely the musical score will. It's so horrendous and simple.

The story also doesn't flow very well. I think that the movie tries to tell too much in a too short running time (the movie is only about one and an halve hour long). Some of the cuts don't work and the movie often takes too big leaps in its time-line.

In all honesty, the movie really didn't started off as a bad one but about halve way through the movie I had the feeling that I had seen it all by now and the movie just wasn't heading anywhere interesting anymore with its story and characters.

Guess that the only true redeeming quality of the movie is its acting. The movie is filled with some big- and superb actors. Christina Ricci proofs she can really act and by now is far more than just another ex-child movie star. Jessica Lange also gives an impressive performance as the mother. The rest of the movie seems weirdly cast but all of the actors work out pretty well in their roles, such as Jason Biggs in a good serious role and Anne Heche as a psychiatrist, though the choice for her seems weird, considering her own psychological history. The movie further more features Michelle Williams and Jonathan Rhys Meyers in some small but good roles.

It's a pointless to watch this movie, since the main character is hard to ever relate to and she's far from a like-able one. Only perhaps watchable if you yourself can relate to the events and main character of the movie.

4/10

Watch trailer

Top