It's definitely true that back in the day the 'alien autopsy' video was a big deal. I remember it very well and I also remember it always had looked incredibly fake and unlikely to me, no matter how young I still was at the time. But I actually never had any idea that the story behind it was more than just a joke or a simple con.

This movie tells the story behind the fake video, in an humorous way, with the involvement of the two main guys behind the video, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield. It's hard to say though what got based on the truth and what were the things that got made up, specifically for this movie. In that regard this movie might be a bigger con than its actual subject. But even if only half of it is true, which is a likely assumption, it still is a deliciously odd and interesting story.

The movie truly benefits from its comical approach. It suits the crazy story and it allows the movie to heavily exaggerated stuff and get away with it as well. It's a very British movie though, with all of its comedy, dialog and characters, so if that's not your thing, this is simply not the right type of comedy or movie for you to watch.

Even though the movie is exaggerated, the comedy still manages to feel as often something more subtle. It definitely is not a movie that constantly forces you to laugh. It often are the simplest and littlest of things this movie draws most of its comedy from. It makes the movie fun but above all things also a very entertaining watch, all throughout.

It's also true though that they perhaps could had done a bit more with its story, comedy and characters. Instead, the movie starts to repeat itself at times and stretches some of its comical moments also out for a bit too long. It doesn't make it a bad movie but it's part of the reason why this still feels as a far from perfect movie.

The movie also hardly ever focuses on the negative aspects. Perhaps the movie is a bit for good for its own good and tries to show its main characters as harmless and friendly blokes, who never had any bad intentions with their video. Perhaps if the real Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield wouldn't had been involved with this movie, this would had been a bit of a more fair and objective movie but I'm truly not complaining too much about any of this, since I liked the movie good enough for what it was and enjoyed it all throughout, mostly due to this approach. 

It's not a movie with any big name actors in it, expect those playing the 'foreigners', in this case the Americans. Bill Pullman and Harry Dean Stanton show up but they sort of feel out of place in this. I don't know, I guess it shows that it takes some different acting and some different actors when you appear in an all British production.

The movie is nothing too great but it simply is an entertaining and simple little production, about a greatly fun and interesting subject!

7/10

Watch trailer

(Review originally written at 17 August 2006)

Pierce Brosnan was one fine Bond, so it's a shame he had to play in two of the worst Bond movies, this one and "The World is Not Enough". But of course even a bad Bond remains an entertaining one to watch, with lots of spectacular action, pretty girls and cool gadgets.

The story always has been sort of secondary in Bond movies but this one takes the cake. The story is absolutely ridicules and far from well conceived and handled. The idea of an media-tycoon wanting to fully control and create the news for his own personal satisfaction is a totally unlikely but above all a ridicules one. It makes the story as a whole ridicules, even for a Bond movie. The movie is filled with implausibilities and the movie never succeeds in making the story work compelling or engaging.

The movie handles lots of things wrongly, mainly things involving its story. I think this is probably due to Roger Spottiswoode's directing, who isn't exactly known as the best director or storyteller around. Lots of fine characters are wasted in this movie. Especially Teri Hatcher as the Bond girl, who Bond actually does have feelings for. Teri Hatcher plays the best and most interesting Bond girl in years but she only is in the movie for about 15 minutes. A real waste of a great and fine looking character, played by a great actress. Instead now were stuck with the bland acting Michelle Yeoh as a Chinese agent, who helps Bond on the mission. No offensive but Bond and Asians never worked out in the movies. There just is no chemistry and it helps to makes the character feel like an obsolete one.

Also the villains, a important Bond element, are wasted in this movie. Jonathan Pryce is a fine actor and he plays a great villain but due to the ridicules story, his character never convinces enough. Jonathan Pryce deserved to play a villain in a better Bond movie. We don't that often see him as a villain but with this movie he shows his versatility as an actor and proofs that he can play cold-hearted, ruthless villains as well. The rest of the villains feel more like an obligation than they are needed in the story, with the exception perhaps of the recently deceased Vincent Schiavelli who always is great to watch in any movie.

Thankfully some good Bond-regulars also show up again. Judi Dench is great as M and definitely a more serous one than the Bernard Lee M, who obviously mainly often served as a comic relief. They tried to change his character into a more serious one in the later Bond movies and replaced him with Robert Brown after Bernard Lee's death in 1981 and turned his character into a more serious one but none of them worked out quite as satisfying and powerful as the Judi Dench character. She gave the M character more personality and sense of power and control. A woman with balls, you may say. Other Bond-regulars in this movie are; Q (Desmond Llewelyn), Miss Moneypenny (Samantha Bond), Charles Robinson (Colin Salmon) and Jack Wade (Joe Don Baker).

The movie begins great and spectacular in perhaps one of the greatest Bond openings. Unfortunately the movie never lives up to its opening sequence, ever again, later in the movie. Basically the opening sequence is the only truly great and memorable sequence of the entire movie. The movie further more is filled with lots of spectacular action sequences and they do entertaining but I simply prefer a good old fashioned fistfight above a machine-gun shootout any day. It makes this Bond movie feel sort of artificial and without any heart or true inspiration. It has all the Bond elements, girls, action, the usual characters and gadgets but still this movie doesn't really feel as a Bond. Also the end sequence, normally the best and most spectacular, are disappointing in this movie and help to make this movie an extremely forgettable one.

Visually the movie is good looking and it has some fine cinematography in most of its sequences. Also the effects are good but it's a sort of unwritten rule that how more special effects are in a Bond, the worse the movie is, with some exceptions left out. The musical score by David Arnold is also fine and fitting for the movie. At first I didn't liked any of his Bond scores but they have grown onto me and I really start to appreciate and see the greatness of them all.

It's a movie that does entertaining but it doesn't do this consistently throughout the entire movie. It's filled with implausibilities and unlikely elements which causes this movie to have some unfortunately weaker and extremely forgettable moments.

5/10

Watch trailer