Style2

Dead Man Down (2013) Directed by Niels Arden Oplev



Still not really sure about whether this was a good movie or not. On the one hand, it isn't really doing anything terribly wrong but on the other it's just never the most exciting, entertaining or interesting movie to watch.

It's one of those thrillers that's going for a more gritty and realistic approach but the problem with it is that the movie its story isn't really suited for such a type of approach really. The movie is told in a (needlessly) complicated and slow manner but the story in itself is a quite simple and straightforward one actually. The movie may have worked out better, if only it had a more clever and less formulaic type of script involved. It still tries to tell its story in a clever and surprising way but without getting its viewers ever involved enough with either its story or characters.

The movie is told in such a complicated way at times, that the movie actually becomes hard to follow, despite its still very straightforward main plot line. Ultimately it's nothing more but a revenge flick, only told as if it's something way more than just that, without ever really truly becoming something more interesting or better than just the average revenge thriller.

It's a bit of a problem that the movie is taking itself so seriously, all throughout. There is never any room for any sort of entertainment or even any other lighter type of moments. So no, this is not a movie you should expect to get any fun out of. And it really could have used some more bright spots and lighter moments in it. The movie as it is does not only look very bleak, it also really feels that way.

But that's also due to how the actors portray their characters in this movie. They constantly keep a straight face and it seems to be impossible for them to smile (well, at least for Noomi Rapace's character there is a good explanation for it, early on in the movie). Especially the movie its main character, played by Colin Farrell, feels like a very bland one, just because of that. He's not a very likable protagonist, also because the movie does a poor job at giving him enough background and a strong and sensible enough character motivation.

It feels that the movie either should have been one totally focused on its characters and as a sort of character study if you will, with more depth and emotions to it, or as a more Hollywoodized thriller, with some more intriguing twists and developments to it. The movie now isn't really being either one of those and it feels stuck somewhere between different movie styles, without ever doing anything interesting or surprising enough to constantly keep you intrigued and involved.

The movie is still not a bad one and I also do still consider it to be perfectly watchable but it just isn't one that I can wholeheartedly recommend as well.

6/10

Watch trailer

The Brave One (2007) Directed by Neil Jordan

-->



(Review originally written at 10 December 2008)

Of course this movie gets compared a lot to the Charles Bronson movie "Death Wish" and its countless sequels. After all, it uses exactly the same premise of a main character who takes rights into his/her own hands after his/her lover gets killed. A sidewalk vigilante of which the police don't really know if it needs to be grateful or hateful towards. But yet "The Brave One" is surprisingly different from "Death Wish" and although it has the same premise it picks a totally different and more subtle approach.

The movie is of course also different because it has a female lead, rather than a tough male one. Jodie Foster, who makes about one movie every three years or so, really isn't the most likely person in a movie like this. It isn't a role you would expect from her but she simply does a good job with it and she really doesn't feel out of place within this movie. She blends in well with her character, that seems to suit her right. She of course also is a great actress and she knows to carry most part of the movie entirely alone.

It's a movie with a subtle approach, that goes deeper into things about what it means once a 'normal' person kills a person and how it changes and affects her. This is the one thing that makes "The Brave One" such a fine and interesting movie to watch. It doesn't remain just on the surface but actually starts to explore things and raises some questions.

However the movie also suffers from a problem a couple of more Neil Jordan movies suffer from as well. You don't always care enough- and feel involved enough with the main character. His movies always try to go deeper but yet they are not always that involving. Because of this its more deeper and subtle things don't always work out quite as effectively as intended. Just think about movies such as "The Company of Wolves" and "Michael Collins", though he also has had some successes with it. For instance with movies such as "The Crying Game" and "Interview with the Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles". The one time it works out, the other it doesn't. In this case it doesn't really. At least not enough to really care and completely feel one with the character's actions and motivations. Neil Jordan also gets some point deduction for not so subtly ripping off the brilliant love sequence from the 1974 movie "Don't Look Now".

It's a movie with a nice gritty and raw style though, which should remind you of some '70's movies. It also uses some typical experimental '70's camera-work to achieve this. But yet it's also a movie with lots of pace, despite the fact that there aren't always a lot of exciting things happening.

Besides Jodie Foster the movie also has some other fine and well known actors starring in it, though there roles aren't all big enough to make a significant enough impression. Terrence Howard is still important and he also does a good job with his role but Mary Steenburgen and Jane Adams are just walking around in this movie. A waste of their talents really.

Good and also surprisingly original with its themes but not really involving enough to grab you or leave a true lasting impression.

6/10

Watch trailer

Top