Style2

L'atalante (1934) Directed by Jean Vigo

-->



(Review originally written at 22 September 2008)

Jean Vigo was a director who now more is being appreciated then during his lifetime. This movie was his only full length feature and he died shortly after completing it (he had been in bad health for basically all of his life). His movies get admired for its poetic-realism and if you've seen one of his movies you'll know why. It are always beautiful looking movies, with also a touch of surrealism to it but always with heart and realism. The characters and emotions within the movies are always feeling very real. It's a shame he died so early, for he could had surely delivered some fine many more movies, with his unique and great style.

I was impressed by the movie its acting, which seemed to be ahead of its time with its more realistic approach involved. It made the story and therefore also the entire movie as a whole work out as a tender and believable one. It's a very humane movie with real characters and warmth involved. Of course biggest star of the movie is Michel Simon, who had starred in some well known, mostly 1930's, French productions. He plays his character in his trademark strange and comical style. Seriously, has this guy ever played a 'normal' character in his career?

It's a movie that gets carried by its actors and main characters but also really the movie its fine script obviously help. The movie is basically like a random slice of life and about a young married couple who live on a ship, along with its other colorful crew members. When the woman discovers the Paris night life, she decided to stay ashore, much to the grief of the husband, who slips into a depression. What follows is a story with many different emotions to it but always with a very realistic touch and feeling to it.

The movie is really wonderful looking, with some good nimble editing and fine cinematography from later Oscar winner Boris Kaufman and two assistants Louis Berger and Jean-Paul Alphen. But its fine visuals should not in the should also be credited to Jean Vigo's directing approach and way he chooses to tell the story. It's a beautiful movie to look at, as well as it is wonderful to follow the movie its story and get involved with the movie it's main character, portrayed by capable actors.

I simply loved watching this movie!

10/10

Zéro de conduite: Jeunes diables au collège (1933) Directed by Jean Vigo





(Review originally written at 3 September 2008)

Yes, this movie is surrealistic alright. Perhaps not as much as for instance a Luis Buñuel movie but it features lots of symbolism and metaphors. You have to like these sort of movies obviously to fully appreciate and enjoy it.

It's of course also a protest to the very strong regime on boarding schools, which makes this movie a social commentary, like often surrealistic-like movies are. It caused Jean Vigo's movies not to be appreciated until after WW II, since prior to that his movies mostly got banned everywhere.

French always had a thing with revolutions, which also plays a central theme within this movie. The movie might feel and look a bit disjointed at times but its always connected through its central themes.

As odd as this movie might seem like at times, it always knows to remain an enjoyable one, with also some good comedy in it at times, as well as some great looking and directed sequences.

An enjoyable little short surrealistic picture from Jean Vigo.

8/10

Boudu sauvé des eaux (1932) Directed by Jean Renoir





(Review originally written at 11 August 2008)

It's a movie with some more subtle humor but nevertheless it's not really a movie that could ever make me laugh, which was mostly because due to Michel Simon his very over the top portrayal of the tramp Boudu. You know, the kind of performance in which he plays his character constantly in a drunk way in an attempt to make him look funny. Also his look is far from convincing, with his fake looking beard and big wig. Hello afro! It just isn't the best or most likable character imaginable. When it comes down to French comedy from the early days of cinema ('20' and '30's) this really isn't the best the genre has to offer. For instance you're way better off watching a René Clair movie.

The movie can be seen as a social commentary to the French bourgeoisie and difference between classes. It's this element mostly that makes the movie an interesting watch. No denying that Jean Renoir was a great director who knew how to set up a story and scenes. He also always gets his point across, without having to force too much. Like always, he also in this movie uses some interesting sequences that have deeper meanings to it and the movie is filled with some metaphors.

As you could expect from a Jean Renoir movie, it's also technically a good one. The movie features some interesting camera-shots, which must have also been really original and revolutionary for its time. The editing isn't always too great however.

Not Renoir's best but it's an enjoyable enough little movie.

7/10

Top