Style2

The Boston Strangler (1968) Directed by Richard Fleischer





(Review originally written at 16 August 2007)

Many people know that the '70's were the decade of the innovative and experimental movies. What most don't know is that this style of movie-making already started in the the mid '60's, with movies such as "Grand Prix", "Bullitt" and of course this one.

The movie fantastically uses multiple split-screen effects to tell the story. What can I say, I just have a weak spot for this sort of stuff. I'm a Brian De Palma fan, so I need to say no more I would think. You can argue if all those split-screen sequences are necessary and serve a purpose. It however provides the movie with so much originality, pace and creativity that it uplifts the movie as a whole. Not only the split-screen sequences in the movie are innovative, there also are lots of other creative sequences in the movie that help to make this an extremely original and brilliant movie to watch.

But not only the style is '70's like, also the gritty and straightforward story-telling of the movie is. This movie reminded me very much of the Fritz Lang classic "M". It had the sort of same approach and storyline about the manhunt on a criminal, without really focusing on one character, or any other distracting plot-line. It makes the movie feel like a documentary like observation of the Boston strangler events.

The acting is absolutely top-class. Just like in "M", the murderer doesn't appear in full form until late into the movie. A great move, that increases the tension and mystery of the movie. I think that Tony Curtis was absolutely greatly cast as Albert DeSalvo, who gives him personality and gives him an animal feel at the same time. Also the other actors are first-class, with people such as Henry Fonda, George Kennedy and Murray Hamilton in some great roles. It's some of the best acting you'll see in an '60's movie. The acting, just like the entire approach of the movie, is very realistic and help to make the story and its atmosphere work out.

I've never been too fond of '50's and '60's movies, since they mostly are all the same in their approach and are slow moving with some outdated acting in it. but thanks to movies like this one, my appreciation is really starting to grow.

Due to its approach and style the movie is an interesting one from start till finish, that also provide the movie with a welcome unpleasant and uneasy atmosphere, that help to make this an haunting and memorable thriller.

10/10

Watch trailer

The Unsuspected (1947) Directed by Michael Curtiz



(Review originally written at 1 May 2007)

This was a great little surprise. Most film-noir's from the '40's are always a good watch and this movie is also certainly among the better one's of its period. A real surprise, considering that this movie is a fairly unknown one and is directed by Michael Curtiz, who had his most success- and is best known for directing entertaining, adventurous movies.

To be honest, the movie really doesn't begin well. At first it seems like the movie is a typical mystery/thriller in which a woman cannot remember a man, who claims to be her husband. The movie looks like a mostly talking-flick with standard characters and a good story that however lacks in serious tension and just isn't interesting enough. However soon the movie starts to take a positive turn, when it slowly abandons this plot line and turns into a murder-mystery. The movie becomes tense, atmospheric and completely captivating. The movie really gets better by the minute, as it heads toward the ending and it begins to develop better layered- and more developed story lines.


Too bad that still the fine second halve can't fully compensate for the more weaker first halve of the movie.


The movie is skillfully put together by cast and crew. The movie has a great visual look and I especially love the use of shadows in this movie. It makes some of the sequences really look marvelous, while they serve a purpose as well. They also help to make the movie as a whole a very atmospheric piece of work, that has a perfect required tense, dangerous and mysterious feeling all over it. It shows that Michael Curtiz could handle the genre really well as a director.


Claude Rains really plays a great role in this movie. Joan Caulfield also showed that she was beautiful as well as talented. Too bad that Ted North for most part ruins the first halve of the movie with his stiff and weak acting. Apparently he agreed with me, since this movie was his last movie role (or did he die shortly after this movie?). The movie further more features some great cast supporting actors, such as Jack Lambert and Harry Lewis.


A great little unknown genre movie from Michael Curtiz, that film-noir lovers will surely be able to appreciate, despite its weaker, less interesting, first 40 minutes, or so.


8/10

Top